Reply to comment on the courage awards Mr. Savard Galloway

Thursday, December 3, 2009

Reply to comment on the courage awards Mr. Savard Galloway
Unable to perform Translation:invalid textMr. Savard, make sure that kind of Canadians, you 're there to produce.
Unable to perform Translation:invalid textThere isn 'an Old Quote: "is a woman raped and strangled is morally superior to a woman with a smoking gun and a dead rapist at her feet? " It is this kind of Canadian values that we talk about?
Unable to perform Translation:invalid textOnly about jewelry, you'd be happier if Mr Galloway was the fate of Kramer Meir, a 56-year-owner jewelry Geneve, located at 67 Boulevard Samson Ste-Dorothée, Laval Group, which soon was found bound and a blood pooling in the area behind the store. E 'wild and very rarely seen in flight with a certain brutality wrought with injuries including a deep coma, broken ribs on both sides, the face is 5 points, broken hand, broken, and intracranial hemorrhage.
Unable to perform Translation:invalid textOr how about the destiny of Erez Lev Thornhill, due to gunshot wounds and traders Mark Lash, who died in the stomach in the same plane flying jewels.
Unable to perform Translation:invalid textOr both flights jewelry in Edmonton, beginning September 2009 attack by a female employee, and the only reason, Mr. Bagga is after 911 is alive, because if a thief, the other says, "He called the police. " Shoot "E 'was able to push the gunman until he was hit in the head with a hammer in the other.
Unable to perform Translation:invalid textO Alberta Diamond Exchange, where six people were taken hostage, bound with tape and threatened with knives. You 're lucky suffer didn ' t, the fate of two students in biochemistry to another flight, bound, gagged and stabbed a total of 250 times, then put his body on fire.
Unable to perform Translation:invalid textOr as the Promenade mall in Thornhill jewelry robbed three times in two years, when the robbers fled a $ 300,000 in jewelry, a center for fire safety, then had a shootout with police on the Leo Baeck Day School with teachers and students meet the operation and hide. He escaped the shooting, and a few moments later he took two women hostage in a van that was shot entirely by the police, narrowly missing women. Fortunately, he lost control of the police van and then be able to arrest him, and he has lost his life.
Unable to perform Translation:invalid textO Mr. Hooper 's jewelry in Bowmanville, where thieves have an employee in a back room and stabbed her, fortunately not fatal.
Unable to perform Translation:invalid textWalk a mile in Mr. Galloway 's shoes, before he self-label.
Unable to perform Translation:invalid textThe flight is often regarded as a crime against property, since he assumed ownership of the victim is generally intended to target the criminals. "However, in practice, it is classified as robbery with violence against a person.
Unable to perform Translation:invalid textProtection is one 's (self or family or friends), which causes death or serious injury, the most fundamental of all human rights. It exceeds all governments, all laws and all the excuses. The police work for the state and although I appreciate the work that are not realistic that once again 'cleaning company with weapons.
Unable to perform Translation:invalid textToo often, politicians and relatives of the dead and wounded, a criminal is the victim of rape to learn self-defense to blame. These people show that the flight did not prevent the victim in the shooting, the thief, the thief to take their property was justified. These statements are completely missed. Robbery is the taking of property by the threat or the threat of violence. In other words, if a thief commits a robbery, are primarily at risk the lives and safety of the victim (s) - the inclusion of the property is really irrelevant. Therefore, the theft, the robbers shot the victim does not prevent thieves taking their property, but to preserve the life of a mortal threat to the thieves.
Unable to perform Translation:invalid textDefend the lives and livelihoods of criminals is not only unfair, but the morally right thing. I encourage you to a grave injustice from / to ask the people sitting watching. Many people, myself included, use the test as a generalization of Kant said. Basically, this test has condemned the immoral acts that could not commit. For example, do not kill people at random, is widespread because there would be no stable society if every murder committed at random. However, arson entering self-defense is widespread. If every family penetrating criminal act by a citizen to be shot to act in defense, not only stable, but the home invasion and related crimes would be considerably reduced. In short, the generalization of Kant and other tests used to determine what is good and evil seems to promote self-defense.
Unable to perform Translation:invalid textThe decision, which could be a violent criminal to take the final decision. The fact is that predators, often violent, even if their victims fully meet its needs. E 'therefore be inappropriate to provide for a victim who can not defend, because security is an innocent human being is certainly not subject to the safety of violent criminals who attack. According to statistics from the Department of Justice is a woman who is four times less likely to do harm if they are defended with a gun. Is your position to condemn their suffering, because you 're one hoplophobe?
Unable to perform Translation:invalid textDo you trust the police with guns? Here 's another statistic for you: The citizens defend themselves with firearms is five times less likely to lose the police. "The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action to tackle it. " (Sir Robert Peel 's nine principles of Police)
Unable to perform Translation:invalid textI 'm happy the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Don ' t tolerate behavior Vigilante, like me, would be expected and tolerated, although a Canadian 't wouldn arson, murder, rape, robbery and assault assault. But this vigilance wasn 't. In short, a civil guard, a person who takes the law into their own hands to punish a criminal for a crime that has already begun. Self-defense on the other side is the use of force by a victim of criminal violation, or to avoid killing the victims. Shooting a robber who threatened his life, it is self-evident defense, because the objective is to escape the murderous attack of robbers, not to punish the thief. He was a man who lives and health of his wife and he saved himself from harm. Vigilantism is against the law. If this were vigilantes had he not been arrested. To illustrate Mr. Galloway as self-defense is to betray his own ignorance, and morally wrong set of values. I can only say thank God, chosen weren 't. You lead them. "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil, that good men do nothing. " (Edmund Burke). Mr Galloway has proven its integrity, and showed his courage. He has done his duty. It has made us very proud. Well, there 's leaders should do things.
Unable to perform Translation:invalid textThe philosophy of being willing participants in our own victimization led to the needless tragedy of rape, theft of jewelry and the murder, the attacks of 11 September. Teach a penalty, that 's not resist, and he puts his profession. Statistics show that almost all get away with crimes of violence for the first time and the army plus ten bandits away with their crimes before being caught. When seconds count police are only minutes away and the police have a duty to protect - you, the citizens are the only person in the world, with a duty to protect their lives. You, the citizens are the only person in the world with the ability to protect their lives. In fact, they are not, then you are guilty breach of peace. Mr. Galloway is a hero and deserves the award, not only to save his family, but also potentially the lives and crimes of harassment after the robbers probably continue to do so.
Unable to perform Translation:invalid textThere were 80 people at the ceremony. Only the politicians, Mr. Savard - sensationalism and losing objections -. Desperate for a little 'free publicity?
Unable to perform Translation:invalid textThey want to know what are Canadian values? Here 's four:
1) No person engaging in violence. The key is to start, not violence.
2) criminals are 100% responsible for the tragedy that broke out because of their crimes,
3) People are tired, sacrifice and
4) You don 't go to a musical recital in grades 3 and yelling "You Suck ' and don 't go to an awards ceremony and just scream" You Suck "is. At least, not without suffering righteous contempt and scorn of every Canadian I know.

0 comments:

About This Blog

Lorem Ipsum

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP